.svg)
HIPAA compliance for software development means building and operating software that handles protected health information (PHI) under the Security Rule's safeguards: encryption everywhere, unique user authentication, audit logging of every PHI access, integrity controls, and the organizational step most teams miss — signing Business Associate Agreements up and down the vendor chain.
Encrypt PHI in transit (TLS) and at rest; authenticate users individually with automatic session timeout; log every create, read, update, and delete of PHI immutably; enforce least-privilege access in the application's permission model; and design for breach response — you must be able to determine exactly whose data an incident touched. De-identify or use synthetic data in development and test environments; production PHI in a staging database is a reportable breach waiting to happen.
Every service that touches PHI — hosting, storage, analytics, email, AI APIs — must sign a BAA or be kept out of the PHI path. This is where third-party AI services commonly fail teams: sending PHI to an API without a BAA is a violation regardless of the API's technical security. The architectural answer is keeping PHI processing inside BAA-covered or self-hosted boundaries.
Teams building healthcare products use ioMoVo as the PHI-safe content layer — BAA-backed, audit-logged, encrypted, with on-premises and air-gapped deployment so PHI never crosses uncovered boundaries. See the ioMoVo healthcare page.
No official certification exists. Compliance is demonstrated through implemented safeguards, documentation, third-party audits (SOC 2, HITRUST), and executed BAAs.
Only with a BAA covering that service — or by running the models inside your own covered environment, which is why BYOLLM architectures matter in healthcare.